BREAKING NEWS
India has expressed concern over perceived shifts in the U.S. stance, particularly its attempts to balance its relationships with both India and Pakistan during the 2025 conflict. Here’s a nuanced breakdown of the situation
The Pahalgam terror attack on April 22, 2025, which resulted in the deaths of 26 civilians, has significantly intensified geopolitical tensions between India and Pakistan. The incident has led to a series of diplomatic, military, and economic responses, marking a notable shift in the bilateral relations of the two nuclear-armed neighbors. In the wake of the 2025 Pahalgam attack, which resulted in the deaths of 26 civilians, India and Pakistan have found themselves at the center of a complex web of international alliances and diplomatic maneuvers. The global response to this conflict reflects a tapestry of historical ties, strategic interests, and regional dynamics.
India’s Response
Suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT)
India suspended the IWT, a 1960 agreement governing the sharing of the Indus River system, citing Pakistan’s alleged support for cross-border terrorism. This move allows India greater autonomy over the use of the Indus, Jhelum, and Chenab rivers, potentially impacting Pakistan’s agriculture-dependent economy.
Diplomatic Measures
India undertook several diplomatic actions, including
Closing the Attari-Wagah border crossing
Revoking visas issued to Pakistani nationals under the SAARC Visa Exemption Scheme.
Expelling Pakistani military advisors from its High Commission in New Delhi and recalling its own from Islamabad.
Reducing the strength of diplomatic missions in both countries to 30 personnel each.
Military and Cyber Operations
India launched “Operation Sindhoor,” targeting terrorist camps in Pakistan-administered territories. Concurrently, Indian cyber defense groups countered over 1.5 million cyberattacks from Pakistani and allied hacktivist groups, breaching several Pakistani government and institutional systems.
Civil Defense Preparedness
India conducted “Operation Abhaya’s,” a nationwide civil defense drill across 244 districts, enhancing civilian readiness against potential threats. Activities included air-raid siren tests, blackout simulations, and evacuation drills
Pakistan’s Reaction
Denial and Counter-Accusations
Pakistan denied involvement in the Pahalgam attack, labeling India’s suspension of the IWT as “water warfare” and an illegal move. Officials warned that any attempt to stop or divert water flow would be considered an act of war.
Airspace Closure
In retaliation to India’s military actions, Pakistan closed its airspace to Indian carriers, escalating to a total airspace closure, affecting regional air traffic.
International Appeal
Pakistan sought an immediate session of the United Nations Security Council to address the escalating tensions and India’s suspension of the IWT.
Geopolitical Implications the United States growing concern for India
India has expressed concern over perceived shifts in the U.S. stance, particularly its attempts to balance its relationships with both India and Pakistan during the 2025 conflict. Here’s a nuanced breakdown of the situation: The U.S. expressed support for India’s fight against terrorism while urging both nations to de-escalate tensions. President Trump emphasized the importance of India and Pakistan resolving issues bilaterally. U.S. Position in the 2025 India–Pakistan Conflict
While the United States officially condemned the Pahalgam terror attack and expressed sympathy with India, President Donald Trump and other top officials repeatedly stressed:
The importance of maintaining “good relations with both India and Pakistan.”
That the U.S. was “doing big deals with both countries,” hinting at parallel economic and security partnerships.
This neutral tone has been interpreted by some in India as a lack of strong support during a moment of heightened crisis.
Strategic Interests in Pakistan
The U.S. has several reasons for hedging its bets:
Counterterrorism logistics and intelligence in the region still involve Pakistan, especially regarding Afghanistan.
Ongoing military-to-military cooperation under certain U.S. aid frameworks continues, albeit reduced.
Geopolitical competition with China may push the U.S. to prevent Pakistan from falling entirely into Beijing’s sphere.
U.S. Mediation Offer
There were indications from Washington that the U.S. was willing to mediate or facilitate dialogue between India and Pakistan — a position India has traditionally rejected, asserting that all disputes should be handled bilaterally. American diplomats urged India to exercise restraint, particularly after India launched Operation Sindhoor. This was perceived in some Indian circles as pressure to hold back, while not holding Pakistan equally accountable.
The 2025 conflict revealed that:
India-U.S. ties are strong but not unconditional.
The U.S. aims to maintain regional balance rather than take sides fully.
India is increasingly turning toward multi-alignment, strengthening ties with France, Russia, and others, to avoid overdependence on the U.S.
The Pahalgam attack has not only strained India-Pakistan relations but also impacted regional dynamics:
Water Security: The suspension of the IWT raises concerns about water security in Pakistan, which heavily relies on the Indus River system for agriculture.
Regional Stability: The involvement of major powers like the U.S., China, and Russia underscores the potential for broader regional instability if tensions are not managed.
Diplomatic Channels: The reduction in diplomatic engagements and increased military posturing highlight the need for renewed dialogue to prevent further escalation.
Pakistan’s Concern and International Isolation
International Isolation and Diplomatic Setback
Diminishing Global Sympathy: After the Pahalgam attack, which India attributed to Pakistan-based terror groups, much of the global community leaned toward supporting India’s right to defend itself, leaving Pakistan diplomatically cornered.
UN Rejection: Pakistan appealed to the United Nations Security Council for intervention following India’s suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT). However, the UN largely urged bilateral de-escalation, not condemning India, which was a major blow to Pakistan’s narrative.
Limited Backing: Apart from traditional allies like China, Turkey, and Malaysia, few countries openly supported Pakistan. Even Muslim-majority nations like UAE and Saudi Arabia took neutral positions, calling for peace rather than backing Pakistan outright.
The Pahalgam terror attack has significantly altered the geopolitical landscape between India and Pakistan. The series of retaliatory measures, diplomatic strains, and international reactions underscore the fragility of peace in the region. While both nations have taken steps to assert their positions, the path to de-escalation lies in constructive dialogue and mutual cooperation to address underlying issues and prevent further conflict.
Email:--------------------------ishfaqalnoortech@gmail.com
India has expressed concern over perceived shifts in the U.S. stance, particularly its attempts to balance its relationships with both India and Pakistan during the 2025 conflict. Here’s a nuanced breakdown of the situation
The Pahalgam terror attack on April 22, 2025, which resulted in the deaths of 26 civilians, has significantly intensified geopolitical tensions between India and Pakistan. The incident has led to a series of diplomatic, military, and economic responses, marking a notable shift in the bilateral relations of the two nuclear-armed neighbors. In the wake of the 2025 Pahalgam attack, which resulted in the deaths of 26 civilians, India and Pakistan have found themselves at the center of a complex web of international alliances and diplomatic maneuvers. The global response to this conflict reflects a tapestry of historical ties, strategic interests, and regional dynamics.
India’s Response
Suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT)
India suspended the IWT, a 1960 agreement governing the sharing of the Indus River system, citing Pakistan’s alleged support for cross-border terrorism. This move allows India greater autonomy over the use of the Indus, Jhelum, and Chenab rivers, potentially impacting Pakistan’s agriculture-dependent economy.
Diplomatic Measures
India undertook several diplomatic actions, including
Closing the Attari-Wagah border crossing
Revoking visas issued to Pakistani nationals under the SAARC Visa Exemption Scheme.
Expelling Pakistani military advisors from its High Commission in New Delhi and recalling its own from Islamabad.
Reducing the strength of diplomatic missions in both countries to 30 personnel each.
Military and Cyber Operations
India launched “Operation Sindhoor,” targeting terrorist camps in Pakistan-administered territories. Concurrently, Indian cyber defense groups countered over 1.5 million cyberattacks from Pakistani and allied hacktivist groups, breaching several Pakistani government and institutional systems.
Civil Defense Preparedness
India conducted “Operation Abhaya’s,” a nationwide civil defense drill across 244 districts, enhancing civilian readiness against potential threats. Activities included air-raid siren tests, blackout simulations, and evacuation drills
Pakistan’s Reaction
Denial and Counter-Accusations
Pakistan denied involvement in the Pahalgam attack, labeling India’s suspension of the IWT as “water warfare” and an illegal move. Officials warned that any attempt to stop or divert water flow would be considered an act of war.
Airspace Closure
In retaliation to India’s military actions, Pakistan closed its airspace to Indian carriers, escalating to a total airspace closure, affecting regional air traffic.
International Appeal
Pakistan sought an immediate session of the United Nations Security Council to address the escalating tensions and India’s suspension of the IWT.
Geopolitical Implications the United States growing concern for India
India has expressed concern over perceived shifts in the U.S. stance, particularly its attempts to balance its relationships with both India and Pakistan during the 2025 conflict. Here’s a nuanced breakdown of the situation: The U.S. expressed support for India’s fight against terrorism while urging both nations to de-escalate tensions. President Trump emphasized the importance of India and Pakistan resolving issues bilaterally. U.S. Position in the 2025 India–Pakistan Conflict
While the United States officially condemned the Pahalgam terror attack and expressed sympathy with India, President Donald Trump and other top officials repeatedly stressed:
The importance of maintaining “good relations with both India and Pakistan.”
That the U.S. was “doing big deals with both countries,” hinting at parallel economic and security partnerships.
This neutral tone has been interpreted by some in India as a lack of strong support during a moment of heightened crisis.
Strategic Interests in Pakistan
The U.S. has several reasons for hedging its bets:
Counterterrorism logistics and intelligence in the region still involve Pakistan, especially regarding Afghanistan.
Ongoing military-to-military cooperation under certain U.S. aid frameworks continues, albeit reduced.
Geopolitical competition with China may push the U.S. to prevent Pakistan from falling entirely into Beijing’s sphere.
U.S. Mediation Offer
There were indications from Washington that the U.S. was willing to mediate or facilitate dialogue between India and Pakistan — a position India has traditionally rejected, asserting that all disputes should be handled bilaterally. American diplomats urged India to exercise restraint, particularly after India launched Operation Sindhoor. This was perceived in some Indian circles as pressure to hold back, while not holding Pakistan equally accountable.
The 2025 conflict revealed that:
India-U.S. ties are strong but not unconditional.
The U.S. aims to maintain regional balance rather than take sides fully.
India is increasingly turning toward multi-alignment, strengthening ties with France, Russia, and others, to avoid overdependence on the U.S.
The Pahalgam attack has not only strained India-Pakistan relations but also impacted regional dynamics:
Water Security: The suspension of the IWT raises concerns about water security in Pakistan, which heavily relies on the Indus River system for agriculture.
Regional Stability: The involvement of major powers like the U.S., China, and Russia underscores the potential for broader regional instability if tensions are not managed.
Diplomatic Channels: The reduction in diplomatic engagements and increased military posturing highlight the need for renewed dialogue to prevent further escalation.
Pakistan’s Concern and International Isolation
International Isolation and Diplomatic Setback
Diminishing Global Sympathy: After the Pahalgam attack, which India attributed to Pakistan-based terror groups, much of the global community leaned toward supporting India’s right to defend itself, leaving Pakistan diplomatically cornered.
UN Rejection: Pakistan appealed to the United Nations Security Council for intervention following India’s suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT). However, the UN largely urged bilateral de-escalation, not condemning India, which was a major blow to Pakistan’s narrative.
Limited Backing: Apart from traditional allies like China, Turkey, and Malaysia, few countries openly supported Pakistan. Even Muslim-majority nations like UAE and Saudi Arabia took neutral positions, calling for peace rather than backing Pakistan outright.
The Pahalgam terror attack has significantly altered the geopolitical landscape between India and Pakistan. The series of retaliatory measures, diplomatic strains, and international reactions underscore the fragility of peace in the region. While both nations have taken steps to assert their positions, the path to de-escalation lies in constructive dialogue and mutual cooperation to address underlying issues and prevent further conflict.
Email:--------------------------ishfaqalnoortech@gmail.com
© Copyright 2023 brighterkashmir.com All Rights Reserved. Quantum Technologies