BREAKING NEWS
A GIS-based planning system could be put into practice in such a way as to establish a detailed spatial framework which incorporates land use, ecological features, hydrological units, and development pressures
Very recently a resolution seeking denotification of Phaak and rural Block of Harwan from the Srinagar metropolitan Master Plan was moved in the legislative Assembly proposing removing of these rural area from LCMA jurisdiction and regulating them through Panchayat Raj and the rural development frameworks. The idea of removing Rural Block Harwan from the Srinagar Metropolitan Area and at the same time reducing the regulatory functions of the Lake Conservation and Management Authority (LCMA) should be assessed in the light of the methods used in modern metropolitan and regional planning, rather than relying on the simplistic urban–rural distinction which still prevails in local administrative and political echelon discussions and deliberations. The key issue in planning is not whether Harwan or the village of Phaak in it has the physical characteristics of a rural area, but whether it’s spatial, infrastructural, hydrological and ecological connections still remain naturally and functionally integrated into the Srinagar metropolitan system. These connections do not disappear just because of an administrative reclassification or denotification. By definition and in accordance with international practice, a metropolitan region is not the same as a stretch of continuous urban land or mosaic. It is a complex spatial system made up of central urban settlements, satellite towns, agricultural zones, forest areas, transport routes, drainage system, hills, mountains and regions of ecological importance. Since rural areas are therefore an essential part of the spatial structure of a metropolitan region rather than an oddity that should be removed, the suggestion to denominate it purely based on a physical interpretation of rurality is a specious and wrongly identified the issue; the concern of the residents of Phaak and Harwan is with the regulatory burden, not with being part of the metropolitan area. Rurality within a metropolitan boundary is therefore not an anomaly; it is an integral component of metropolitan spatial structure. The more appropriate planning response is consequently not to equate metropolitan inclusion with urbanisation, nor rural character with regulatory exclusion. It is to establish a differentiated planning regime in which rural settlements retain their rural morphology and developmental rights while remaining subject to the metropolitan and ecological parameters necessary to protect the larger regional system. Thus focuses on co-existence of urbanity and rurality, their interdependence and perspective of that today’s metropolitan rural areas as complementary to functional system, also foresees influence and impact of metropolitanisation in near future in the vicinity of metropolis.
The Srinagar Metropolitan Region
The fact that the planning area of Srinagar has been expanded under the Master Plan 2035 shows the long-term process of peri-urbanization and the way in which the surrounding communities have become functionally integrated with the city. The planning area now covers about 766 square kilometres, which is one order of magnitude more than the municipal core, and it is meant to deal with development and environmental resources rather than simply leading to further urban sprawl. Other metropolitan planning systems—most clearly the Mumbai Metropolitan Region, the planning area of which is about 4,355 square kilometres and includes considerable rural and agricultural areas within its Regional Plan—prove that rural development and metropolitan planning are not mutually exclusive; instead they are managed together through different spatial strategies. This aligns with a general conclusion in the literature on metropolitan governance to the effect that the peri-urban interface, referring to an area which in terms of land use, is still rural but is functionally linked to urban economies, infrastructure, and ecological systems forming a viable a part of the planning area. Since Harwan and Phaak lie right within this interface, their settlement patterns, agricultural lands, and natural drainage systems are not peripheral to the ecological well-being of Srinagar; rather, they are at the heart of it, especially in relation to the Dal and Nigeen lake systems .
Hydrological Functionalism
The Dal–Nigeen catchment area is a hydrological unit whose behaviour does not conform to the limits of the Panchayats or the planning regions. The part of the catchment that feeds these lakes reaches into the upper section of the Harwan block, and the streams, springs and surface drainage in that area form the main sources of inflow and the means by which sediment is transported to the lake system. Any land-use decisions taken in this upper part of the catchment such as the removal of vegetation, modifying the slope, carrying out construction on the recharge areas and changing the natural drainage, construction activities and change in land use pattern will have a direct effect on the amount of sediment, the influx of nutrients and the altered hydro-periods downstream. Consequently, modern environmental planning holds that ecological systems should be managed in accordance with their functional geography especially in terms of watersheds, floodplains, and recharge areas rather than according to arbitrary administrative boundaries. If Harwan and Phaak areas are denotified from the metropolitan structure this would not cut its ecological connections with the lake; those connections are biophysical and continue to exist regardless of any reclassification of administrative status. All that denotification would achieve is to take the upstream land-use decisions out of the one planning framework currently able to evaluate the cumulative impacts at the catchment level. The outcome would be a regulatory vacuum exactly in the place where regulatory oversight is most important.
False Equivalence Between Regulatory Differentiation and Uniform Urbanization
A common misconception in the present discussion is that including Phaak and Harwan in the Srinagar Metropolitan Area means that an urban development model has to be imposed on them. However, modern metropolitan planning practice rejects this idea. By means of differentiated spatial planning, it is possible to have different regulatory systems within a single metropolitan area: urban zones, suburban areas, agricultural landscapes, conservation zones, and rural settlement areas can all be included in one spatial plan, each being subject to performance standards suitable to its particular nature. The example of the London metropolitan area is instructive. Since the 1948 Town and Country Planning Act the Metropolitan Green Belt has been a statutory provision and has been strengthened by the various London Plans, in that it incorporates open land, agricultural areas and rural settlements into the urban system without forcing their urbanisation. The green belt policy does not forbid all development nor does it require urban density; instead it controls change by means of categories of allowed development and tests of openness. The point for Srinagar is that metropolitan inclusion is a matter of jurisdiction, not a requirement regarding building form.
Rural Planning Sub-Zone Within the Metropolitan Area
The solution for the people living in Phaak and Harwan who are suffering from the improper application of urban-oriented development regulations should not be to remove these areas from the metropolitan region but instead to establish a differentiated form of planning form a Rural Planning Sub-Zone within the Srinagar Metropolitan Region.This sub-zone being capable of maintaining the present rural features while at the same time benefiting from metropolitan-level regulatory supervision. Within this sub-zone, a tiered development-control system could operate. Low-impact developments, such as single-family rural housing, agricultural buildings, and minor expansions of existing homes, could follow simpler rules set to keep the rural landscape. These rules would include standards for rainwater management, on-site sanitation, and slope stability. Higher-impact proposals, like commercial buildings, institutional campuses, tourism infrastructure, and any project that affects the whole catchment, would still face review by the metropolitan authority. This review would include checking the combined effects of these projects.
Performance-Based Regulation and Carrying Capacity
The future planning system ought to favour performance-based regulation over the use of traditional plot-focused measures. In such a performance-based system, the question that arises instead of asking whether a site is classified as urban or rural becomes one concerning its carrying capacity and the total effect of development on it. In the case of ordinary rural housing, the performance criteria could include provisions for rainwater harvesting, greywater treatment, septic system standards, and limits on impervious surfaces. Where the site is ecologically sensitive such as in the case of riparian buffers, steep slopes, recharge areas, and the fringes of wetlands. For these more stringent guidelines ate needed to be introduced in order to protect water quality, hydrological function and serene urban landscape. The redefinition of the situation removes the urban–rural dichotomy as a factor in regulation. A house in Phaak and a house in central Srinagar would be evaluated using the same criteria on the basis of impact per unit of ecological sensitivity even if the standards actually used are different. A system of this kind is more defensible from an administrative point of view, more legally sound, and more ecologically effective than one which involves categorical exclusion.
Recalibrating the LCMA
It is important to keep the LCMA responsible for ecological matters due to the ecological importance of the Dal–Nigeen catchment. Yet it is neither necessary nor advantageous to give equal regulatory treatment in all cases. The LCMA should keep control over important ecological issues such as lake buffers, drainage channels, wetlands, critical landscapes, and recharge zones, land use while arranging simplified procedures for low-impact/intensity rural developments in cooperation with local governing bodies. A protocol involving the various agencies could be put into practice by having the LCMA set ecological limits and carry out regular monitoring at the catchment level; building permits for ordinary cases are managed by the Panchayat or the rural local body within previously approved boundaries; and more significant change which need to be calibrate and referred for joint evaluation. This kind of setup would take into account the administrative concerns of rural communities within an urban framework without creating a regulatory gap in areas that are particularly sensitive.
Settlement Consolidation vs. Spatial Dispersal
The difference between rural settlement development and rural land consumption is of the greatest analytical importance. Since existing settlements need support services, improvements to the infrastructure, and room for natural growth, planning should aim at improving them rather than allowing uncontrolled peri-urban sprawl. Uncontrolled development such as development that takes the form of ribbons development along the roads, the conversion of agricultural land, and the fragmentation of landholdings could result in serious environmental damage, especially due to changes in drainage, greater runoff, and the loss of the green-blue infrastructure network which supports the metropolitan area adjacent sensitive lake system. Instead dispersal, settlement consolidation should be the main principle; by reinforcing the existing infrastructure and keeping the surrounding agricultural and ecological areas, the metropolitan green-blue infrastructure network is maintained that is, the interconnected system of forests, wetlands, streams, and open land which carries out flood control, biodiversity conservation, and climate regulation functions. Metropolitan authority shall on priority frame zonal development plans for these areas to address their existing and foreseeable requirements.
Integrating Catchment as Blue-Green Infrastructure
It is necessary to include the Dal–Nigeen catchment area in Srinagar's planning system as part of the blue-green infrastructure. This approach takes into account the functional interconnections between natural systems and the processes occurring in metropolitan areas, such as flood mitigation, the recharging of groundwater, the conservation of biodiversity, and providing recreational facilities. Recognising the ecological value of rural landscapes improves the region's resilience to the effects of extreme weather and urbanization which is a matter of increasing importance given that the Himalayan region is now experiencing more erratic patterns of precipitation and temperature.
GIS-Based Planning and Governance Model
A GIS-based planning system could be put into practice in such a way as to establish a detailed spatial framework which incorporates land use, ecological features, hydrological units, and development pressures. With such a system, development-control measures would be able to take account of the different levels of ecological sensitivity within the catchment, thus encouraging informed and spatially specific decision-making. By carrying out overlay analysis on the layers relating to slope, soil, drainage, land use, and settlement, a sensitivity classification could be produced which directly determines the permissible development areas. The planning model for Srinagar should include three interconnected levels: a local level of governance which deals with the needs of the villages and with ordinary development; a metropolitan level which looks after regional growth, infrastructure and the allocation of land; and an ecological level which is responsible for managing natural resources and the environmental effects. The Panchayati Raj institutions should be incorporated into the metropolitan planning system, with local matters being assigned to the Panchayat and the ecological as well as the more general spatial issues remaining at the metropolitan level and being supervised by the LCMA or a similar body.
Way Forward
Retaining Phaak and Harwan within the Srinagar Metropolitan Region offers strategic benefits which include cohesive land-use planning, coordinated infrastructure development and critically the need for coupling of upstream land-use decisions. The debate over Phaak and Rural Block Harwan should therefore move beyond the choice between metropolitan regulation and rural development. The real planning challenge is to reconcile rural settlement rights, metropolitan growth management and ecological carrying capacity. The experience of planning elsewhere demonstrates that rural landscapes and settlements can remain within metropolitan planning regions while being governed through differentiated planning instruments. Mumbai’s regional plan explicitly incorporates development through Local Growth Centres within the metropolitan framework while Londons strategic planning system protects Green Belt and Metropolitan Open Land as integral components of metropolitan spatial structure and green infrastructure. For Srinagar the ecological argument is particularly compelling because Phaak and Harwan are not merely rural settlements. They form part of a landscape hydrologically and environmentally connected to the Dal–Nigeen system. Accordingly the technically robust planning approach is to retain these areas within the Srinagar Metropolitan Area and maintain an integrated lake-catchment planning framework while fundamentally reforming the manner in which rural development is regulated. The appropriate policy architecture would be one of development control, subsidiarity, risk-sensitive regulation, GIS-based land-use management, rural settlement consolidation and catchment-level ecological safeguards. The objective should not be to urbanise the landscape.. Should it be to isolate rural communities from metropolitan planning. It should be to create a region in which urban, rural and ecological systems are planned as interdependent components of one territorial system. Therefore for Phaak and Harwan the planning principle can be expressed succinctly: Retain the areas within the metropolitan spatial framework; recognise and protect their rural character through differentiated development controls; decentralise routine rural development functions to Panchayati Raj institutions; but retain integrated catchment-level ecological regulation wherever land-use decisions can affect Dal and Nigeen. The larger lesson for Srinagar is equally significant. A metropolitan region is not defined by density and municipal limits alone. Its real spatial extent is determined by the flows of people, water, infrastructure, land, ecology and economic activity that bind its settlements together. The future of Srinagar’s planning should therefore be based not on the separation of urban and rural jurisdictions but on the integration of settlement systems, with the ecological systems that sustain them.
Email:-------------------------------------- hamwani24@gmail.com
A GIS-based planning system could be put into practice in such a way as to establish a detailed spatial framework which incorporates land use, ecological features, hydrological units, and development pressures
Very recently a resolution seeking denotification of Phaak and rural Block of Harwan from the Srinagar metropolitan Master Plan was moved in the legislative Assembly proposing removing of these rural area from LCMA jurisdiction and regulating them through Panchayat Raj and the rural development frameworks. The idea of removing Rural Block Harwan from the Srinagar Metropolitan Area and at the same time reducing the regulatory functions of the Lake Conservation and Management Authority (LCMA) should be assessed in the light of the methods used in modern metropolitan and regional planning, rather than relying on the simplistic urban–rural distinction which still prevails in local administrative and political echelon discussions and deliberations. The key issue in planning is not whether Harwan or the village of Phaak in it has the physical characteristics of a rural area, but whether it’s spatial, infrastructural, hydrological and ecological connections still remain naturally and functionally integrated into the Srinagar metropolitan system. These connections do not disappear just because of an administrative reclassification or denotification. By definition and in accordance with international practice, a metropolitan region is not the same as a stretch of continuous urban land or mosaic. It is a complex spatial system made up of central urban settlements, satellite towns, agricultural zones, forest areas, transport routes, drainage system, hills, mountains and regions of ecological importance. Since rural areas are therefore an essential part of the spatial structure of a metropolitan region rather than an oddity that should be removed, the suggestion to denominate it purely based on a physical interpretation of rurality is a specious and wrongly identified the issue; the concern of the residents of Phaak and Harwan is with the regulatory burden, not with being part of the metropolitan area. Rurality within a metropolitan boundary is therefore not an anomaly; it is an integral component of metropolitan spatial structure. The more appropriate planning response is consequently not to equate metropolitan inclusion with urbanisation, nor rural character with regulatory exclusion. It is to establish a differentiated planning regime in which rural settlements retain their rural morphology and developmental rights while remaining subject to the metropolitan and ecological parameters necessary to protect the larger regional system. Thus focuses on co-existence of urbanity and rurality, their interdependence and perspective of that today’s metropolitan rural areas as complementary to functional system, also foresees influence and impact of metropolitanisation in near future in the vicinity of metropolis.
The Srinagar Metropolitan Region
The fact that the planning area of Srinagar has been expanded under the Master Plan 2035 shows the long-term process of peri-urbanization and the way in which the surrounding communities have become functionally integrated with the city. The planning area now covers about 766 square kilometres, which is one order of magnitude more than the municipal core, and it is meant to deal with development and environmental resources rather than simply leading to further urban sprawl. Other metropolitan planning systems—most clearly the Mumbai Metropolitan Region, the planning area of which is about 4,355 square kilometres and includes considerable rural and agricultural areas within its Regional Plan—prove that rural development and metropolitan planning are not mutually exclusive; instead they are managed together through different spatial strategies. This aligns with a general conclusion in the literature on metropolitan governance to the effect that the peri-urban interface, referring to an area which in terms of land use, is still rural but is functionally linked to urban economies, infrastructure, and ecological systems forming a viable a part of the planning area. Since Harwan and Phaak lie right within this interface, their settlement patterns, agricultural lands, and natural drainage systems are not peripheral to the ecological well-being of Srinagar; rather, they are at the heart of it, especially in relation to the Dal and Nigeen lake systems .
Hydrological Functionalism
The Dal–Nigeen catchment area is a hydrological unit whose behaviour does not conform to the limits of the Panchayats or the planning regions. The part of the catchment that feeds these lakes reaches into the upper section of the Harwan block, and the streams, springs and surface drainage in that area form the main sources of inflow and the means by which sediment is transported to the lake system. Any land-use decisions taken in this upper part of the catchment such as the removal of vegetation, modifying the slope, carrying out construction on the recharge areas and changing the natural drainage, construction activities and change in land use pattern will have a direct effect on the amount of sediment, the influx of nutrients and the altered hydro-periods downstream. Consequently, modern environmental planning holds that ecological systems should be managed in accordance with their functional geography especially in terms of watersheds, floodplains, and recharge areas rather than according to arbitrary administrative boundaries. If Harwan and Phaak areas are denotified from the metropolitan structure this would not cut its ecological connections with the lake; those connections are biophysical and continue to exist regardless of any reclassification of administrative status. All that denotification would achieve is to take the upstream land-use decisions out of the one planning framework currently able to evaluate the cumulative impacts at the catchment level. The outcome would be a regulatory vacuum exactly in the place where regulatory oversight is most important.
False Equivalence Between Regulatory Differentiation and Uniform Urbanization
A common misconception in the present discussion is that including Phaak and Harwan in the Srinagar Metropolitan Area means that an urban development model has to be imposed on them. However, modern metropolitan planning practice rejects this idea. By means of differentiated spatial planning, it is possible to have different regulatory systems within a single metropolitan area: urban zones, suburban areas, agricultural landscapes, conservation zones, and rural settlement areas can all be included in one spatial plan, each being subject to performance standards suitable to its particular nature. The example of the London metropolitan area is instructive. Since the 1948 Town and Country Planning Act the Metropolitan Green Belt has been a statutory provision and has been strengthened by the various London Plans, in that it incorporates open land, agricultural areas and rural settlements into the urban system without forcing their urbanisation. The green belt policy does not forbid all development nor does it require urban density; instead it controls change by means of categories of allowed development and tests of openness. The point for Srinagar is that metropolitan inclusion is a matter of jurisdiction, not a requirement regarding building form.
Rural Planning Sub-Zone Within the Metropolitan Area
The solution for the people living in Phaak and Harwan who are suffering from the improper application of urban-oriented development regulations should not be to remove these areas from the metropolitan region but instead to establish a differentiated form of planning form a Rural Planning Sub-Zone within the Srinagar Metropolitan Region.This sub-zone being capable of maintaining the present rural features while at the same time benefiting from metropolitan-level regulatory supervision. Within this sub-zone, a tiered development-control system could operate. Low-impact developments, such as single-family rural housing, agricultural buildings, and minor expansions of existing homes, could follow simpler rules set to keep the rural landscape. These rules would include standards for rainwater management, on-site sanitation, and slope stability. Higher-impact proposals, like commercial buildings, institutional campuses, tourism infrastructure, and any project that affects the whole catchment, would still face review by the metropolitan authority. This review would include checking the combined effects of these projects.
Performance-Based Regulation and Carrying Capacity
The future planning system ought to favour performance-based regulation over the use of traditional plot-focused measures. In such a performance-based system, the question that arises instead of asking whether a site is classified as urban or rural becomes one concerning its carrying capacity and the total effect of development on it. In the case of ordinary rural housing, the performance criteria could include provisions for rainwater harvesting, greywater treatment, septic system standards, and limits on impervious surfaces. Where the site is ecologically sensitive such as in the case of riparian buffers, steep slopes, recharge areas, and the fringes of wetlands. For these more stringent guidelines ate needed to be introduced in order to protect water quality, hydrological function and serene urban landscape. The redefinition of the situation removes the urban–rural dichotomy as a factor in regulation. A house in Phaak and a house in central Srinagar would be evaluated using the same criteria on the basis of impact per unit of ecological sensitivity even if the standards actually used are different. A system of this kind is more defensible from an administrative point of view, more legally sound, and more ecologically effective than one which involves categorical exclusion.
Recalibrating the LCMA
It is important to keep the LCMA responsible for ecological matters due to the ecological importance of the Dal–Nigeen catchment. Yet it is neither necessary nor advantageous to give equal regulatory treatment in all cases. The LCMA should keep control over important ecological issues such as lake buffers, drainage channels, wetlands, critical landscapes, and recharge zones, land use while arranging simplified procedures for low-impact/intensity rural developments in cooperation with local governing bodies. A protocol involving the various agencies could be put into practice by having the LCMA set ecological limits and carry out regular monitoring at the catchment level; building permits for ordinary cases are managed by the Panchayat or the rural local body within previously approved boundaries; and more significant change which need to be calibrate and referred for joint evaluation. This kind of setup would take into account the administrative concerns of rural communities within an urban framework without creating a regulatory gap in areas that are particularly sensitive.
Settlement Consolidation vs. Spatial Dispersal
The difference between rural settlement development and rural land consumption is of the greatest analytical importance. Since existing settlements need support services, improvements to the infrastructure, and room for natural growth, planning should aim at improving them rather than allowing uncontrolled peri-urban sprawl. Uncontrolled development such as development that takes the form of ribbons development along the roads, the conversion of agricultural land, and the fragmentation of landholdings could result in serious environmental damage, especially due to changes in drainage, greater runoff, and the loss of the green-blue infrastructure network which supports the metropolitan area adjacent sensitive lake system. Instead dispersal, settlement consolidation should be the main principle; by reinforcing the existing infrastructure and keeping the surrounding agricultural and ecological areas, the metropolitan green-blue infrastructure network is maintained that is, the interconnected system of forests, wetlands, streams, and open land which carries out flood control, biodiversity conservation, and climate regulation functions. Metropolitan authority shall on priority frame zonal development plans for these areas to address their existing and foreseeable requirements.
Integrating Catchment as Blue-Green Infrastructure
It is necessary to include the Dal–Nigeen catchment area in Srinagar's planning system as part of the blue-green infrastructure. This approach takes into account the functional interconnections between natural systems and the processes occurring in metropolitan areas, such as flood mitigation, the recharging of groundwater, the conservation of biodiversity, and providing recreational facilities. Recognising the ecological value of rural landscapes improves the region's resilience to the effects of extreme weather and urbanization which is a matter of increasing importance given that the Himalayan region is now experiencing more erratic patterns of precipitation and temperature.
GIS-Based Planning and Governance Model
A GIS-based planning system could be put into practice in such a way as to establish a detailed spatial framework which incorporates land use, ecological features, hydrological units, and development pressures. With such a system, development-control measures would be able to take account of the different levels of ecological sensitivity within the catchment, thus encouraging informed and spatially specific decision-making. By carrying out overlay analysis on the layers relating to slope, soil, drainage, land use, and settlement, a sensitivity classification could be produced which directly determines the permissible development areas. The planning model for Srinagar should include three interconnected levels: a local level of governance which deals with the needs of the villages and with ordinary development; a metropolitan level which looks after regional growth, infrastructure and the allocation of land; and an ecological level which is responsible for managing natural resources and the environmental effects. The Panchayati Raj institutions should be incorporated into the metropolitan planning system, with local matters being assigned to the Panchayat and the ecological as well as the more general spatial issues remaining at the metropolitan level and being supervised by the LCMA or a similar body.
Way Forward
Retaining Phaak and Harwan within the Srinagar Metropolitan Region offers strategic benefits which include cohesive land-use planning, coordinated infrastructure development and critically the need for coupling of upstream land-use decisions. The debate over Phaak and Rural Block Harwan should therefore move beyond the choice between metropolitan regulation and rural development. The real planning challenge is to reconcile rural settlement rights, metropolitan growth management and ecological carrying capacity. The experience of planning elsewhere demonstrates that rural landscapes and settlements can remain within metropolitan planning regions while being governed through differentiated planning instruments. Mumbai’s regional plan explicitly incorporates development through Local Growth Centres within the metropolitan framework while Londons strategic planning system protects Green Belt and Metropolitan Open Land as integral components of metropolitan spatial structure and green infrastructure. For Srinagar the ecological argument is particularly compelling because Phaak and Harwan are not merely rural settlements. They form part of a landscape hydrologically and environmentally connected to the Dal–Nigeen system. Accordingly the technically robust planning approach is to retain these areas within the Srinagar Metropolitan Area and maintain an integrated lake-catchment planning framework while fundamentally reforming the manner in which rural development is regulated. The appropriate policy architecture would be one of development control, subsidiarity, risk-sensitive regulation, GIS-based land-use management, rural settlement consolidation and catchment-level ecological safeguards. The objective should not be to urbanise the landscape.. Should it be to isolate rural communities from metropolitan planning. It should be to create a region in which urban, rural and ecological systems are planned as interdependent components of one territorial system. Therefore for Phaak and Harwan the planning principle can be expressed succinctly: Retain the areas within the metropolitan spatial framework; recognise and protect their rural character through differentiated development controls; decentralise routine rural development functions to Panchayati Raj institutions; but retain integrated catchment-level ecological regulation wherever land-use decisions can affect Dal and Nigeen. The larger lesson for Srinagar is equally significant. A metropolitan region is not defined by density and municipal limits alone. Its real spatial extent is determined by the flows of people, water, infrastructure, land, ecology and economic activity that bind its settlements together. The future of Srinagar’s planning should therefore be based not on the separation of urban and rural jurisdictions but on the integration of settlement systems, with the ecological systems that sustain them.
Email:-------------------------------------- hamwani24@gmail.com
© Copyright 2023 brighterkashmir.com All Rights Reserved. Quantum Technologies