Demography is more than just a collection of numbers; it is the silent force that reshapes societies, cultures, and political destinies. In Kashmir, where identity and politics are tightly interwoven, demographic changes carry far-reaching consequences. Today, a quiet but profound transformation is unfolding in the Valley, one that pits the declining fertility of native Kashmiris against the rising numbers of Gujjar and Bakarwal communities. If the trends continue unchecked, the Kashmir of 2040 will look very different in terms of population balance, political influence, and cultural identity.
At the heart of this shift lies the difference in fertility. Gujjar and Bakarwal families still maintain fertility levels around four, nearly double the replacement rate. This ensures that each generation is not only replacing itself but also expanding. By contrast, the fertility rate of native Kashmiris has fallen to 1.4, far below replacement level. In demographic terms, this represents a silent crisis. A community that consistently reproduces below replacement is bound to shrink, and with shrinking comes ageing, reduced workforce participation, and declining influence. The divergence is already visible in growth rates: Gujjar–Bakarwals are growing at 2.5 percent annually, while native Kashmiris are at 1.1 percent. In simple terms, tribes are expanding at twice the speed.
Marriage patterns further accentuate the divide. Among Gujjar and Bakarwal families, the average age of marriage remains around 21 to 22 years. This allows for longer reproductive spans and larger families. Native Kashmiris, on the other hand, increasingly marry late. With marriage age crossing 30 in many urban and semi-urban areas, the reproductive window narrows sharply, leading to fewer children and a higher risk of infertility or childlessness. What is striking is that this delay in marriage is not just a personal choice but is shaped by social and economic realities—unemployment, soaring marriage expenses, and the burden of dowry practices. Where tribal families view marriage as a natural and early milestone, native Kashmiri families are pushing it further into the thirties, with long-term consequences for family size and demographic sustainability.
The question of family stability also shows a striking contrast. Among Gujjar and Bakarwal families, divorce is negligible. Marriage is seen as permanent, and families remain cohesive. Among native Kashmiris, however, divorce rates have climbed steadily. Modern stress, mismatched expectations, financial strain, and changing gender dynamics all contribute to this rise. This trend not only reduces fertility further but also weakens social networks and support systems. Children are often caught in the crossfire, which adds to long-term social instability.
Demography never remains confined to homes and families; it inevitably reshapes politics. In Kashmir, this process is already underway. The delimitation exercise of 2024 redrew boundaries to bring tribal areas more firmly into the political mainstream. South Kashmir’s parliamentary seat now includes vast stretches of tribal populations, meaning political parties can no longer ignore them. Even the National Conference, which historically drew its strength from native Kashmiris, had to nominate a tribal candidate in one of its seats to remain relevant. This signals a clear pattern for the future: as Gujjar and Bakarwal numbers grow, they will demand greater representation, more reserved seats, and stronger voices in decision-making. The Scheduled Tribe status already ensures job reservations and assembly quotas, but with population growth, their demands will expand. What was once peripheral could soon become central to Kashmir’s political life.
This rising population also creates resource pressures. Gujjar and Bakarwal livelihoods depend on forests, grazing lands, and pasture rights. As their numbers expand, so too will their demand for land, resources, and quota expansion. Native Kashmiris, already struggling with urban congestion, declining farmland, and unemployment, may see these demands as encroachment. Unless carefully managed, such competition risks creating tension between the groups. Political parties, always alert to the opportunity, may use such issues for vote bank politics, aggravating divisions. What begins as demographic reality could turn into social conflict if manipulated.
Beyond politics and economics lies the most sensitive concern: identity. Kashmiri culture, with its centuries-old language, literature, and traditions, has always been central to the Valley’s identity. But culture is not immune to numbers. With Gujjar, Bakarwal, and Pahari-speaking populations expanding, the cultural balance is shifting. Already, Kashmiri is competing with mixed dialects in some areas. While cultural diversity enriches any society, unchecked demographic imbalance could dilute the Kashmiri identity within its own homeland. If current trends persist, by 2040 the Kashmiri language and cultural ethos may face marginalization, overshadowed by tribal and Pahari influences.
The real question, then, is what choices are available. For native Kashmiris, the declining fertility rate, late marriages, and rising divorce patterns point to deep socio-economic problems. Youth unemployment, unaffordable weddings, and weak social support systems have created a perfect storm. If these issues are not addressed, demographic decline will accelerate. For Gujjars and Bakarwals, rapid growth brings both empowerment and responsibility. Greater numbers mean greater representation and stronger claims, but they also carry the duty of ensuring harmony and avoiding friction over resources. For policymakers, the challenge is to strike a balance: to provide fair representation without breeding resentment, and to ensure resources are shared without creating hostility.
The story of Kashmir’s demographic transformation is not one of hostility between groups but of contrasts between trends. One community is growing, the other shrinking. One is holding firmly to traditional structures, the other is pulled by modern pressures. If ignored, these contrasts could reshape politics, strain resources, and blur cultural identities. But if addressed wisely, they could lead to a balanced and diverse society.
It must be emphasized that highlighting these issues is not meant to sow division. Gujjars, Bakarwals, Paharis, and native Kashmiris are all part of the Valley’s fabric. This article is instead a wake-up call. Numbers, if left unexamined, can silently rewrite history. The 2040 that awaits Kashmir will depend on whether these demographic realities are managed with wisdom, cooperation, and foresight.

Email:------------------------artistmalik46@gmail.com