The elections in Jammu and Kashmir once again highlight a disturbing trend that has plagued our democracy for decades: the persistence of dynastic politics. Among the newly elected members of the Legislative Assembly (MLAs), at least 13 come from political families, following in the footsteps of relatives who have either contested or won elections in the past. Unsurprisingly, the National Conference leads in the number of legislators with family ties. While political legacies may seem natural in a democracy where public service is passed from one generation to the next, the rise of dynastic politics undermines the very principles of meritocracy, accountability, and democratic representation. At its core, democracy is about equal opportunity—providing every citizen the chance to serve, regardless of their background. Dynastic politics, however, reduces this ideal to a narrow privilege, reserved for a select few families who wield disproportionate influence. The dominance of such political dynasties restricts the entry of fresh and deserving talent, perpetuating the control of political power by a few elites. This entrenches inequality and fosters a culture of entitlement rather than public service. In Jammu and Kashmir, the implications of dynastic politics are particularly profound as we have a complex political history. When a majority of politicians are from established families, the political narrative often remains stagnant. The same voices dominate the discourse, making it harder for innovative ideas and solutions to emerge. Moreover, such entrenched family-based political networks can lead to cronyism, where political power is wielded not for the public good but to benefit the family’s interests and preserve their influence. Dynastic politics also alienates the youth, who may feel disillusioned by the lack of opportunities in public service. When political candidacy is treated as an inherited right, it discourages young, motivated individuals without political connections from aspiring to leadership roles. This has long-term consequences, as it erodes faith in the democratic process and limits the pool of competent leaders. As Jammu and Kashmir is undergoing significant political and administrative changes, there is an urgent need for new leadership, free from the baggage of family-based politics. Political parties must make space for deserving candidates who have a genuine commitment to public service, rather than continuing to reward familial loyalty. The electorate, too, should demand more from their leaders—choosing individuals based on merit, vision, and the ability to govern effectively, rather than their last names. Ending dynastic politics is not merely about changing the faces in the legislature but about restoring faith in the democratic system itself. Only by fostering an environment where political opportunities are open to all can we ensure a vibrant, dynamic, and truly representative democracy in Jammu and Kashmir.