BREAKING NEWS

04-20-2026     3 رجب 1440

Nari Shakti Act: Promise of Empowerment

The real problem is that the system under which this reservation is being implemented is itself not transparent and fair. The lack of democracy within political parties, the opacity in ticket distribution, and the centralization of leadership ensure that opportunities are distributed more based on proximity than merit

April 20, 2026 | Dr. Priyanka Saurabh

When the Nari Shakti Vandan Act was passed in India, it was hailed as "historic," Parliament erupted in applause, and a new era of women's empowerment was announced. But amidst all this celebration, an uncomfortable question persisted: are the doors of politics truly open for women, or is it merely a new symbolic framework being created into which the same old image of power will be fitted? The character of Indian politics has been more realistic and, at times, harsh, than idealistic. Where equations prevail over principles, and morality often shifts according to the convenience of power, expecting that reservation alone will change the character of the system may be naive. Increasing women's participation in politics is a fundamental democratic necessity, but the question is whether this participation will translate into genuine empowerment or whether the same power structures will adapt them to their own mold, as they have done with every new entrant. The path to entry into politics is still extremely complex, with pressures from family, capital, connections and party loyalty at play. For women, the path becomes even more difficult as they face additional hurdles such as social constraints, character questions and lack of opportunities. To assume that every woman who rises will do so only through compromise is not only an oversimplification but also an insult to the struggles of thousands of women who are making their way through their hard work and talent.
The real problem is that the system under which this reservation is being implemented is itself not transparent and fair. The lack of democracy within political parties, the opacity in ticket distribution, and the centralization of leadership ensure that opportunities are distributed more based on proximity than merit. Therefore, even if seats are reserved for women, they will not necessarily emerge as truly independent and empowered representatives; rather, they may become part of the same power game where decisions are made elsewhere and faces are seen elsewhere. This is why both hope and apprehension about this law are natural, because if the structure remains unchanged, the outcome will remain the same as before. The question of ethics in politics is also central to this debate, as a culture of "contact" and "compromise" has long existed in the corridors of power, and it is not limited to women but permeates the entire system. Therefore, if this culture is not challenged, reservations could become ingrained in the same structure and lose their original purpose.
It's also important to understand that increasing representation doesn't guarantee change. Sometimes, even newcomers fall into the trap of following old patterns because the system forces them to do so. Therefore, any reform should be evaluated not just on the basis of numbers, but on its impact. Whether increasing the number of women will bring sensitivity to policies, prioritize social issues, or will politics simply continue in the same old direction with new faces is an open question that only time will answer. The most important element in this entire scenario is accountability. If anyone, whether male or female, abuses power, action should be taken against them. However, this requires independent and strong institutions that can function without political pressure. Unfortunately, the nexus between crime and politics has become a serious problem today, where in many cases the accused are protected and the voices of the victims are suppressed. Expecting reservation alone to solve this problem is unrealistic.
As a solution, we need comprehensive reforms, bringing transparency within political parties, establishing clear and fair criteria for ticket distribution, developing safe and independent grievance mechanisms for women so they can express themselves without fear, and preparing them not just as symbolic representatives but as capable and trained leaders. This requires political education, resources, and institutional support. And most importantly, a change in societal mindsets, because unless women are given equal status, no law will fully achieve its objective. Ultimately, we must understand that the solution to the country's problems lies not simply in increasing the number of seats, but in strengthening education, health, and infrastructure, because only an empowered society can lay the foundation for a strong democracy. The Nari Shakti Vandan Act is an opportunity, but it will only be meaningful if implemented with honesty and foresight; otherwise, it will remain a new mask, hiding the same old image of power behind it.

 


Email:--------------------saurabhpari333@gmail.com

BREAKING NEWS

VIDEO

Twitter

Facebook

Nari Shakti Act: Promise of Empowerment

The real problem is that the system under which this reservation is being implemented is itself not transparent and fair. The lack of democracy within political parties, the opacity in ticket distribution, and the centralization of leadership ensure that opportunities are distributed more based on proximity than merit

April 20, 2026 | Dr. Priyanka Saurabh

When the Nari Shakti Vandan Act was passed in India, it was hailed as "historic," Parliament erupted in applause, and a new era of women's empowerment was announced. But amidst all this celebration, an uncomfortable question persisted: are the doors of politics truly open for women, or is it merely a new symbolic framework being created into which the same old image of power will be fitted? The character of Indian politics has been more realistic and, at times, harsh, than idealistic. Where equations prevail over principles, and morality often shifts according to the convenience of power, expecting that reservation alone will change the character of the system may be naive. Increasing women's participation in politics is a fundamental democratic necessity, but the question is whether this participation will translate into genuine empowerment or whether the same power structures will adapt them to their own mold, as they have done with every new entrant. The path to entry into politics is still extremely complex, with pressures from family, capital, connections and party loyalty at play. For women, the path becomes even more difficult as they face additional hurdles such as social constraints, character questions and lack of opportunities. To assume that every woman who rises will do so only through compromise is not only an oversimplification but also an insult to the struggles of thousands of women who are making their way through their hard work and talent.
The real problem is that the system under which this reservation is being implemented is itself not transparent and fair. The lack of democracy within political parties, the opacity in ticket distribution, and the centralization of leadership ensure that opportunities are distributed more based on proximity than merit. Therefore, even if seats are reserved for women, they will not necessarily emerge as truly independent and empowered representatives; rather, they may become part of the same power game where decisions are made elsewhere and faces are seen elsewhere. This is why both hope and apprehension about this law are natural, because if the structure remains unchanged, the outcome will remain the same as before. The question of ethics in politics is also central to this debate, as a culture of "contact" and "compromise" has long existed in the corridors of power, and it is not limited to women but permeates the entire system. Therefore, if this culture is not challenged, reservations could become ingrained in the same structure and lose their original purpose.
It's also important to understand that increasing representation doesn't guarantee change. Sometimes, even newcomers fall into the trap of following old patterns because the system forces them to do so. Therefore, any reform should be evaluated not just on the basis of numbers, but on its impact. Whether increasing the number of women will bring sensitivity to policies, prioritize social issues, or will politics simply continue in the same old direction with new faces is an open question that only time will answer. The most important element in this entire scenario is accountability. If anyone, whether male or female, abuses power, action should be taken against them. However, this requires independent and strong institutions that can function without political pressure. Unfortunately, the nexus between crime and politics has become a serious problem today, where in many cases the accused are protected and the voices of the victims are suppressed. Expecting reservation alone to solve this problem is unrealistic.
As a solution, we need comprehensive reforms, bringing transparency within political parties, establishing clear and fair criteria for ticket distribution, developing safe and independent grievance mechanisms for women so they can express themselves without fear, and preparing them not just as symbolic representatives but as capable and trained leaders. This requires political education, resources, and institutional support. And most importantly, a change in societal mindsets, because unless women are given equal status, no law will fully achieve its objective. Ultimately, we must understand that the solution to the country's problems lies not simply in increasing the number of seats, but in strengthening education, health, and infrastructure, because only an empowered society can lay the foundation for a strong democracy. The Nari Shakti Vandan Act is an opportunity, but it will only be meaningful if implemented with honesty and foresight; otherwise, it will remain a new mask, hiding the same old image of power behind it.

 


Email:--------------------saurabhpari333@gmail.com


  • Address: R.C 2 Quarters Press Enclave Near Pratap Park, Srinagar 190001.
  • Phone: 0194-2451076 , +91-941-940-0056 , +91-962-292-4716
  • Email: brighterkmr@gmail.com
Owner, Printer, Publisher, Editor: Farooq Ahmad Wani
Legal Advisor: M.J. Hubi
Printed at: Sangermal offset Printing Press Rangreth ( Budgam)
Published from: Gulshanabad Chraresharief Budgam
RNI No.: JKENG/2010/33802
Office No’s: 0194-2451076
Mobile No’s 9419400056, 9622924716 ,7006086442
Postal Regd No: SK/135/2010-2019
POST BOX NO: 1001
Administrative Office: R.C 2 Quarters Press Enclave Near Pratap Park ( Srinagar -190001)

© Copyright 2023 brighterkashmir.com All Rights Reserved. Quantum Technologies

Owner, Printer, Publisher, Editor: Farooq Ahmad Wani
Legal Advisor: M.J. Hubi
Printed at: Abid Enterprizes, Zainkote Srinagar
Published from: Gulshanabad Chraresharief Budgam
RNI No.: JKENG/2010/33802
Office No’s: 0194-2451076, 9622924716 , 9419400056
Postal Regd No: SK/135/2010-2019
Administrative Office: Abi Guzer Srinagar

© Copyright 2018 brighterkashmir.com All Rights Reserved.