Not Life, but a Good Life, Is to Be Chiefly Valued- Socrates.
Look around and you will observe that the society we live in has already decided the perks of being successful and what success should look like. A good job, a high income, social recognition and material achievements are often treated as the only signs of a successful life. Those who choose a different path are sometimes seen as unsuccessful, even if they are content with their lives.
Can we apply one definition of success to every other being?
Every individual has different dreams, talents and priorities. For one person, success may lie in building a business, while for another it may simply mean living a peaceful and meaningful life. The problem begins when a society starts judging people only through a fixed standard, forgetting that every human being deserves equal dignity and respect.
This concern is reflected through the writings of contemporary political philosophers. John Rawls reminds us that a just society is one that allows every individual the freedom to pursue their own idea of good life under fair conditions. Ronald Dworkin goes a step further by arguing that every person deserves equal concern and respect, irrespective of the choices they make or the social status they achieve.
This article is an attempt to question the conventional meaning of success. It argues that justice is not about making everyone live the same life but creating a society where different choices are respected and where human dignity is valued more than social approval.
John Rawls who is a transformative 20th Century American political philosopher in his masterwork, “A Theory of Justice” presented “Justice as Fairness” arguing that a just society requires equal basic liberties and fair distribution of socio-economic opportunities designated in order to maximize the benefits of the disadvantaged spectrum of the society. He says that a good society is not the one where the rich and the talented succeed but a Just Society is one where even a weakest person is treated fairly and gets real opportunities in life.
Life is a journey which becomes vivid because of the societal pressure or the peer vigilance in order to satisfy the societal norms, stereotypes and prejudices which certainly are not pre-requisite. Ronald Dworkin who was an influential American legal scholar and philosopher says that every human has an important objective. He believed that a just society should not create conditions where some people feel inferior or socially worthless. He believed that equality is not only about money even if, basic resources exist, injustice remains if people are treated like:
Second- Class Citizens.
Socially Invisible

Morally Inferior Beings

Therefore, Equality also requires recognition, dignity and social respect.
Moreover, the real measure of society is not how many successful people it produces, but whether it allows its people to live with dignity, freedom and self-respect. It is perfectly acceptable to fail, to begin again or even to choose a path that others do not understand. After all, a meaningful life is not about meeting society’s expectations; it is about remaining true to one’s own.
Society creates a dominant narrative of success and individuals often begin to measure themselves through that narrative, forgetting that every person has a different understanding of a meaningful life. Justice, therefore, is not only about equality of resources but also about respecting diverse conceptions of the good life.
Moreover, it would be unfair to assume that the individuals alone are responsible for the choices they make. Our understanding of success is shaped by the social world in which we grow up. Family, education, culture, traditions and public expectations gradually influence what we consider valuable in life. In this arsenal, our choices are rarely made in complete isolation.
This sight finds its expression in American political philosopher Michael Sandel’s communitarian critique of Liberalism. He questions the idea of the “Unencumbered Self” that is the assumption that individuals exist independent of their social relationships and can define themselves without reference to their communities. He argues that people are embedded selves, whose identities are formed through the norms, values, traditions and moral commitments of the communities to which they belong. What we aspire to become is often influenced by what society teaches us to admire.
Yet, recognizing the influence of society does not mean accepting every social norm without question. Some norms inspire human flourishing, while others create unnecessary pressure to conform. A society that equates success only with wealth, status or professional achievement risks overlooking lives that are equally meaningful but follow different paths.
It is here that Rawls and Dworkin become equally relevant. While Sandel reminds us that our lives are socially situated, Rawls argues that a just society must provide fair conditions in which individuals can pursue their own conception of the good life. Dworkin further insists that every person deserves equal respect and concern, irrespective of whether their choices correspond to dominant social expectations. Together, these perspectives support the notion that justice is not achieved by enforcing one model of a successful life but by creating conditions in which different life choices can coexist with equal dignity.
Perhaps, the question is not “Who is Successful?” but “Who decides what success means”? As long as society continues to recognise only one path to achievement, many meaningful lives will remain invisible. Success cannot be reduced to a salary, a profession or social recognition. For some, it lies in public accomplishment for others it may lie in quiet fulfilment, meaningful relationships or the freedom to live according to one’s convictions. As Michel Foucault (A French Historian and Philosopher of Ideas) says that society shapes individual’s understanding of success through institutions and systems of power. Success is not a natural or universal concept but is socially constructed and maintained through discipline, surveillance and accepted norms. People often internalize these norms and certainly regulate their own behaviour in order to fit society’s expectations.
Therefore, a just society does not ask everyone to dream the same dream but it creates the space for different aspirations to exist without judgement. It respects the individual while acknowledging the influence of the community. It values people not because they have fulfilled the society’s expectations, but because they possess equal human dignity.
Moreover, it is perfectly acceptable to fail an examination, to change one’s profession, or to choose a life that does not fill the conventional expectations. These decisions do not diminish a person’s worth. What ultimately matters are that whether individuals are able to live a life with dignity, self-respect and the freedom to define a meaningful life for themselves. A society that recognises this diversity is not only more just rather it is more humane.

Email:---------------afreenmanzoor121@gmail.com